Oct 26 2006

他們都是這樣做法

Published by Duke aka 公園仔 at 12:14 am under 閒讀偶拾 |
Hits for this post since 2006/05/28: 2377

這是股神畢菲特(Warren Buffett)最近寫給他企業王國巴郡哈撒韋(Berkshire Hathaway Inc.)旗下高層管理人員的備忘錄。今天讀報,新聞說巴郡的股價已突破每股十萬美元。

To: Berkshire Hathaway Managers (”The All-Stars”)

From: Warren E. Buffett

Date: September 27, 2006

The five most dangerous words in business may be “Everybody else is doing it.” A lot of banks and insurance companies have suffered earnings disasters after relying on that rationale.

Even worse have been the consequences from using that phrase to justify the morality of proposed actions. More than 100 companies so far have been drawn into the stock option backdating scandal and the number is sure to go higher. My guess is that a great many of the people involved would not have behaved in the manner they did except for the fact that they felt others were doing so as well. The same goes for all of the accounting gimmicks to manipulate earnings – and deceive investors – that has taken place in recent years.

You would have been happy to have as an executor of your will or your son-in-law most of the people who engaged in these ill-conceived activities. But somewhere along the line they picked up the notion – perhaps suggested to them by their auditor or consultant – that a number of well-respected managers were engaging in such practices and therefore it must be OK to do so. It’s a seductive argument.

But it couldn’t be more wrong. In fact, every time you hear the phrase “Everybody else is doing it” it should raise a huge red flag. Why would somebody offer such a rationale for an act if there were a good reason available? Clearly the advocate harbors at least a small doubt about the act if he utilizes this verbal crutch.

So, at Berkshire, let’s start with what is legal, but always go on to what we would feel comfortable about being printed on the front page of our local paper, and never proceed forward simply on the basis of the fact that other people are doing it.

A final note: Somebody is doing something today at Berkshire that you and I would be unhappy about if we knew of it. That’s inevitable: We now employ well over 200,000 people and the chances of that number getting through the day without any bad behavior occurring is nil. But we can have a huge effect in minimizing such activities by jumping on anything immediately when there is the slightest odor of impropriety. Your attitude on such matters, expressed by behavior as well as words, will be the most important factor in how the culture of your business develops. And culture, more than rule books, determines how an organization behaves.

Thanks for your help on this. Berkshire’s reputation is in your hands.

每當你聽到有人說:「他們都是這樣做法。」其實這就是響起了警號。要是他們有更好的理由,何需用上這句借口。

75歲的畢菲特是全球第二最富有的人(第一是Bill Gates)。數月前他把八成半身家捐了給慈善基金,總值達370億美元。

370億美元是多少呢?最近黃子華又做棟篤笑,我買了票卻要上課不能去看。有去的朋友告訴我這樣的一段:370億美元,就是你每天中二千萬港元六合彩金多寶,也要連中二十年才夠此數。子華說:「很累呀,天天都中金多寶,停一天可以嗎?」

其實上面這封備忘錄不過是舊調重彈,好幾年前他就跟他的CEO們說:

We can afford to lose money. We can afford to lose a lot of money. But we cannot afford to lose one shed of our reputation. Make sure everything you do can be reported on the front page of your local newspaper, written by an unfriendly but intelligent reporter.

畢菲特講的其賓不是投資法門,而是最基本最純粹的做人道理,放諸處事待人、愛情倫理,皆合用。

RSS feed | Trackback URI

0 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

    8 Comments »

    Comment by abby
    2006-10-26 15:18:17

    sorry.. 不是回應此文的..
    只是想問久石讓演唱會買了飛嗎??

    Comment by Duke aka 公園仔
    2006-10-26 16:41:25

    都有朋友問我有無興趣,但據說(數天前的情況)只餘下最貴的480元票。我覺得太貴了。久石讓是作曲家不是演奏家,我其實有點猶疑聽LIVE是否真的值得。你呢?你買了票嗎?

    我其實最近來問朋友會否有興趣一起多香港藝術節的節目,如波希米亞人生、莫斯科愛樂及1984。

    Comment by abby
    2006-10-27 17:38:40

    最貴是$600啊 , 我很認同你的講法 , 我幫朋友訂了一張$480.她超愛久石讓及宮崎駿.所以一個人去看都願意..

    (Comments wont nest below this level)
     
     
     
    Comment by willsin
    2006-10-26 16:47:13

    >We can afford to lose money. We can afford to lose a lot of money. But we cannot afford to lose one shed of our reputation. Make sure everything you do can be reported on the front page of your local newspaper, written by an unfriendly but intelligent reporter.

    太高調了吧. 能不能正常一點, 承認人性也有它的黑暗面?
    尤其是富可敵國的CEO們, 有那麼多的誘惑, 有那麼大的財力. 真的能那麼光明磊落? 太假惺惺了.

    Comment by Duke aka 公園仔
    2006-10-27 02:41:25

    哲學家,這不只是高調了,你甚至可以說是有點「臭串」,但畢菲特應該串得起。他把八成半身家捐出,大部份是捐予Bill Gates伉儷的慈善基金,Bill Gates曾建議把畢菲特的名字加入為基金名稱(情況跟李生捐錢獲學院命名權差不多),但畢菲特堅拒接受,卻講到明要Bill Gates夫婦親自管理基金,否則可取回捐款。畢菲特的怕的是甚麼呢?他是信不過一般的經理人,因為他們面對如此龐大的財富,很少人能那麼光明磊落,一般人一定會過手濕腳,他們會說:「Everyone else is doing that.」

    我覺得畢菲特這樣說不算陳義過高,而是務實理智,概念有點像廉政公署提出的「陽光測試」,最終壞事被抖出來時,你會否能心安理得。正如備忘錄提及,畢菲特有不少業務其實與金融保險業息息相關,巧妙的會計處理手法,可令公司業績腐朽化神奇,CEO們是如實報告,還是巧立明目?一子錯滿盤皆落索,要警惕的正是終有一天紙包不住火的風險。

    When you have to take a decision in Life, in your professional life, take the one that makes you sleep better not the one that makes you eat better.
    - Ed Lew, Former President of the Society of Actuaries

    CEO們選擇正直守法,並不是假惺惺,而不過是保命之策,可避免他們要惶惶不可終日。Worldcom與Enron事件,就是教訓。

    好像聽說你是教商業倫理的,不知哲學家有何高見,可防止巴郡旗下公司的董事們,走上Enron的歪路?

     
     
    Comment by Legolas
    2006-10-27 07:30:31

    I’m so glad that you have brought to the attention of your blog readers Warren Buffet’s recent writings and their underlying meaning. Such coverage is not lacking in Western media for sure, but it’s definitely not the preference for the local media. This one-of-a-kind mega-rich man deserves to be put on a morality pedestal. In a society and era that worships self-interest at all costs, Buffet is a radiant example who puts moral principles before profit. He is also someone who practises what he preaches. Therefore he could build up a good culture in his organization. After all, a company can only be as good as its leader(s). One wonders why Hong Kong opinion leaders don’t choose to cover Buffet’s actions as widely as possible. More than anything else, the Hong Kong corporate world needs a big dose of moral teachings, if only to set a good example for their corrupt mainland counterparts.

     
    Comment by 阿v
    2006-10-28 11:22:34

    Buffet的話令我想起香港政府的宣傳。政府每推政策,原因一定包括”多數發達國家都在做” (e.g. GST), “Everybody is doing it”. “Why would somebody offer such a rationale for an act if there were a good reason available?”

     
    Comment by fox
    2006-10-30 20:39:38

    Buffett was in MU in this summer…so sad that I didn’t see him around…

     
    Name (required)
    E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
    URI
    Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
    You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

    *
    To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
    Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

    Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:

    Trackback responses to this post