Comments on: 搏拉轉載：情色問卷三種答案

By: Yau

Yau — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 02:46:00 +0000

荒謬呀，東方蘋果太陽風月版會被評為一級，明報問卷竟又被評為二級，淫審處真係痴哂線，唉…

By: The Dukedom of Aberdeen 香港仔公國

The Dukedom of Aberdeen 香港仔公國 — Sat, 26 May 2007 03:09:52 +0000

假如有天我不寫…

轉貼了〈情色問卷三種答案〉後，RSS FEED就說含有亂碼，不能顯示。這個BLOG的FEED，好歹也有九百多人訂閱的嘛。
最初以為是廣東話字如「」、「」做成亂碼，試把它們改成「o既」、「（…

By: Duke aka 公園仔

Duke aka 公園仔 — Sat, 26 May 2007 01:50:57 +0000

古思哲，我也不知道可以移民到哪裡。就如棧主話，可能起碼要換個名字，把網頁存在海外，免得某天因為我那個三級片名POST或某個連結而犯上官非。

思存，得民心者得天下，我思疑我是同意馬文的觀點的，在天星事件上我也指出了當權者一味用強不對。我只是習慣不了這種能鼓動人心的表現手法而已。

小曹，H埠向來就沒有幽默感，說到幽默感，你應該最在行了。

方潤，我想，我的東西也屬「低級趣味」，攀附不了那些「高級品味」。

石頭記的作者，謝謝你提醒兼以TRACKBACK「告發」，也難得能與宋以朗坐著一條船，加上見有不只一位朋友用英文留言，我就不客氣沾光一下，留下宋文的連結：

http://www.zonaeuropa.com/20070525_1.htm

我連結宋以朗最好了，反正都是同樣的「不雅」材料，你們連結了就有石頭記所說的風險。

Kelvin, I think I am an indecent person. I speak foul language occasionally. I try not to use it. But sometimes, you have to.

Paul, you said: “If one day blogging is also being censored, I will not know to where I can escape.” That’s also what I am worrying about.

By: Paul

Paul — Fri, 25 May 2007 23:42:13 +0000

This article from Mingpao is very interesting. Rather than provoking the readers to think about whether the CU questionnaire is obscene or not, the 3 sets of speculated answers crticize three very different ideologies disseminated in this rather mad city. I can’t identify with any of the answers really. They are respectively prudish, uncritical, and out of context. The questions are originally shallow and biased therefore the answers will not be any good either. Yet the reader should be alert to the creative answers which intentionally portrays the narrow-mindedness and escapism of Hong Kong people. The 3 sets of answer somehow misses out groups like middle-class, students and elderly. It would be fun if they are included as well.

The point about escapism in Hong Kong is a bit over-generalized. Escapism needs further explaining. Why people escape from talking about sex? Do people also tend to escape from other sensitive issues like violence, politics, ethics, etc? Obviously the way people avoid talking sex is different from the way of not talking whether I am a Chinese or Hongkongese. The disavowal of sex and its sublimation to moralism and intellectuality is symptomatic of Chinese parents and scholars. Both the questions and answers are ideologically bounded by Chinese values. In the west, people discuss how to have good sex (construting) rather than Hong Kong students who discuss whether having too early/much sex is right or wrong (destructing). As the author says, students in Hong Kong are used to ask T/F and Y/N questions. They have forgotten besides the four Wh words (What, when, who, where), there is the a word called HOW.

I was wrong to think that Hong Kong has freedom of speech when I studied EPA in high school. Our pen, rather than ourselve, need to emigrate. Go online, write here. If one day blogging is also being censored, I will not know to where I can escape.

By: 石頭記

石頭記 — Fri, 25 May 2007 17:57:29 +0000

造反啊！香港博客！…

淫審審淫，《明報》不雅。一貫偉大光榮正確的明光黨總書記蔡志森說，《明報》引用中大…

By: Kelvin

Kelvin — Fri, 25 May 2007 14:07:06 +0000

I couldn’t agree more the Government should take the initiative on folding the indecent and obscene articles tribunal. Instead of investigating on “indecent articles”, why didn’t the Government shift its resource to establish a censorship council on obnoxious behaviour on people in public places, branding those who speaks mobile phones in cinemas, or those who speaks foul language in public transport, as “indecent person”??!! It may sound absurd, but probably this is the “final solution” to these obnoxious behaviour. I have more suggestions on obnoxious behaviour listed in my blog.

By: 這個早晚送檢：

這個早晚送檢： — Fri, 25 May 2007 02:17:34 +0000

這個早晚送檢：

http://blog.age.com.hk/?p=36

By: 方潤

方潤 — Thu, 24 May 2007 15:26:19 +0000

幾年前董生已留伏筆﹕

「低級趣味」嘛﹗

By: 求知者

求知者 — Thu, 24 May 2007 10:22:05 +0000

最令人悲哀的是，淫審處連小小的幽默感也容不了。當日《日月報》副刊的內容，明顯出於一位高人的手筆，擺明是暗串學生報問卷的淫而不樂，但經高人出招，卻變成樂而不淫，既有深度，又夠抵死，絕。誠然，《日月報》也指這是大學教授的手筆。看來，如今高人要再出手，暗嘲淫審處的矯枉過正。如果H埠連開玩笑的空間都冇，諸如《頭條新聞》一類節目也受抨擊，對H埠絕不是福。

By: 思存

思存 — Thu, 24 May 2007 07:21:52 +0000

真荒誕… 今天特別想爆粗。

想當初, 本來許多意見都認為情色版跟”言論自由”是無關的; 用投訴聖經的手段來挑戰淫審制度, 也容易被人打發為”無聊”. 但連明報副刊都容不下, 就實在太過份了

另, 就我對馬文的理解, 不支持學生不會自動變成「偽善的當權者」吧… 或許, 應看提出的理由能否對得上嘴.

又, 權力有小有大, 未至於”垂手可得”, 但卻無處不在.
這年頭要活得自在, 好像不比往日容易。